Yeah. So here's my blog, in abscence of my devotion to my website.

-cotk-

Installment One: How to definitively pwn your math teacher (or at least prove that any answer you give is right).

1. a can be non-zero number, and a=c.
1a. a=c
2. Multiply by a.
2a. a²=ac
3. Subtract c².
3a. a²-c²=ac-c²
4. Factorize!
4a. (a-c)(a+c)=c(a-c)
5. Divide by (a-c)
5a. a+c=c
6. Let's subtract c.
6a. a+c-c=c-c
7. Since there aren't any more c's on the right, we've got -
7a. a=0
8. Since a can be any non-zero number, you can mathematically prove that anything in the world is equal to zero.

Pwned.

-cotk-

Wow... o.0
Someone showed me something like that, showing that a=b. But I proved him wrong, because he divided by 0 :P

You still do, but it's a lot more subtle.

-cotk-

...I still don't see why this is a good place for blogs. I mean, you could just get one from Ceeps Commune and have waaaay more formatting options.

Aye, where you divide by (a-c) you're dividing by 0.... Because a is c, a-c would be 0....

Math.....*twitch* *twitch*

Another blog post.

Today sucked. I got a 65 in bowling ( <_< ). However, I'm planning to blast Rush's 2112 through the jukebox system they have set up tomorrow. Pwned, prog-haterz!

In other news, there's a meeting for Procrastinator's Anonymous sometime in the future.

-cotk-

Procrastinator's Anonymous...sounds like my kind of thing XD
What is it? :D

No, it's just an off-side remark. Sort of a contextual joke. No real substance. :)

-cotk-

XD, shoulda looked at it more thoroughly

In new and other news, I checked out a pimping XHTML book from the school library and rewrote the code for Continuum in about an hour. In spotless XHTML, may I add. :D

It was an *expletive* to keep on checking the code through W3, but it was worth it. :P

-cotk-

I bought Star Wars Battlefront II a week and a half ago.

It's really good, but my mom started saying I was playing it too much.

-muse-

Pfft, I played it for two months in a row for a few hours each day :P

My parents are all martial law on computer use.

YOU'RE TURNING YOUR BRAIN INTO MUSH!!!

-muse-

Yeah, same here. I'm actually doing contructive stuff -like, talking to people and practicing dogfighting skills in an F-15S/MTD - but they think that the computer is evi;. :rolleyes:

I use my dad's business computer.

So...the logic of mathematics is nullified by itself? Any number can have any value?

This isn't really new...a number is a word. Two can mean three and three can mean two...bascially you just mathematically proved that definition of an object does not dictate what the object is. Definition (by definition) can define anything you assign it to, but that definition does not govorn what the object (with the definition assigned to it) actually is- although definition typically is conditioned to describe the observed traits of an object, if you observe dissimilar traits, just because your observation contradicts definition does not make you wrong. If I said an apple was an orange, I wouldn't be incorrect. I simply like to call the red fruit you call an apple, an orange. It's the tomato and tomata theory.

...

Ten points to whoever followed that.

Shut up.

Which could be a request to continue talking if I choose to understand it that way. :D

Pfft, after three seconds of thinking I disproved that a=0 thing. It doesn't work because you divided by zero. (a-c) equals zero, and you cannot divide by zero since dividing by zero creates infinity. Therefore your proof is null.

If this statement is true, Alg is an idiot. Beat that. Only unsolved paradox that I know of.

Then in that case, the statement is true.

...in addition, if interpretation is free of definition and definition only defines what it is conditioned to and does not describe what actually exists with complete accuracy, then definition isn't defined!

I could also say, if this statement is true, then the sky is green.

If we for the sake of argument assume that the sky is green, then the statement is true. However, the statement says that the sky is green if the statement is true. Which is exactly what was just stated: it proves itself.

Untangle THAT logical mess.

I fail to see the relevance. o_O

You can prove anything with that. Any statement at all. I could prove to you the period at the end of this sentence is larger than the Earth.

I think I see what he's getting at: "the period at the end of the sentence" could easily mean "the sun that the earth orbits."

I don't like this conversation. ;-;

I wasn't implying that lack of definition accuracy could be used to prove rediculous ideas. I was pointing out that definition only functions as a convenient order to the world and doesn't really diserve to be taken for granted. However when using these values, to keep from being paralyzed you have to go by the most commonly agreed upon definition in order to communicate at ALL.

Yeah, I acknowledged that the proof was invalid. However, most people are stupid and won't get that.

Anyway, in today's news, I was attacked by a kid easily twice my weight and put in an armlock.

He proceeded to write the word 'doosh' on my work for art.

I kindly rewrote it correctly on his.

-muse-

-muse-

Updates.

-muse-

the soundtrack from Grease was ahead of Are You Experienced?

I cried for an hour afterwards

The things you find on the Interwebs.

-muse-

After your heart explodes!

Uhpdahtay.

-muse-

Awesome coffee banner. XD

^_^